论文部分内容阅读
目的对比无痛胃镜和常规胃镜在上消化道异物中的应用价值。方法选择2014年2月至2016年12月收治的上消化道异物患者74例,随机分成无痛胃镜组和常规胃镜组,各37例,对比两组疗效、不良反应及心率等的差异。结果无痛胃镜组患者治疗总有效率为97.30%,明显大于常规胃镜组的78.38%,组间比较有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗时,无痛胃镜组患者平均动脉压(MAP)、心率与常规胃镜组患者对比具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后两组不良反应总发生率对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论无痛胃镜和常规胃镜应用于上消化道异物的治疗中,无痛胃镜效果比较显著,不良反应少。
Objective To compare the clinical value of painless gastroscopy and conventional endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal tract foreign body. Methods Totally 74 patients with upper gastrointestinal tract foreign body admitted from February 2014 to December 2016 were randomly divided into painless gastroscopy group and conventional gastroscopy group, 37 cases in each group. The curative effect, side effects and heart rate were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of painless gastroscopy group was 97.30%, which was significantly higher than that of conventional gastroscopy group (78.38%, P <0.05). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P <0.05). There was significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of adverse reactions after treatment (P <0.05). Conclusion Painless gastroscopy and conventional gastroscopy used in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal foreign body, painless gastroscopy is more obvious, fewer adverse reactions.