论文部分内容阅读
中国哲学史学科是哲学与历史学的交叉学科,有着还原历史与当代哲学建构两个向度。讨论“中国哲学学科合法性”问题,并不是绝对反对引用西方哲学来解释中国思想,而是指其对本属于以西方哲学为参照的和在西方哲学话语系统中言说的一种比较哲学研究范式缺乏自觉,并且质疑它把自身当作惟一具有正当性的范式的合法性。以哲学的方式叙述和整理中国传统思想,并不是理解和表述中国传统思想的恰当方式。而建立中国哲学史学科自身的话语系统,就是寻求恰当方式的重要步骤。在方法上,以“涤除玄览”暂时搁置种种西方哲学话语,以“虚壹而静”主观搁置种种解释学前见而深入和贴近传统文本,以字义一范畴研究审查和选择概念,是建立中国哲学自身话语系统的一种可能方法。
The discipline of Chinese philosophy is an interdisciplinary course of philosophy and history, with two dimensions of the restoration of history and the construction of contemporary philosophy. To discuss “the legitimacy of Chinese philosophy discipline” is not an absolute objection to using Western philosophy to explain Chinese thought but rather to a lack of a comparative philosophical paradigm which is based on western philosophical discourse and spoken in western philosophical discourse system Consciously, and questioning the legitimacy it sees itself as the only legitimate paradigm. To describe and collate Chinese traditional thoughts in a philosophical way is not the proper way to understand and express Chinese traditional thoughts. The establishment of an own discourse system of the discipline of Chinese philosophy is an important step in finding an appropriate way. In terms of methods, we put aside various Western philosophical discourses in order to “eliminate Xuanjian” temporarily, and lay aside all kinds of explanations such as preaching, penetrating and approaching traditional texts with “oneness and oneness” subjectively, and examining and selecting concepts in a category of meaning, establishing China A Possible Method of Philosophical Discourse System.