海上谢稚柳陈佩秋先生书画合集寿梓,编者请加序文。仓促急就,不能备陈所以,浅绪常言,聊贡心之所向。我在“弥散与生成”国际学术研讨会上曾言及“有意味的形式”(Significant Form)和“有形式的意味”之分殊,以为后者才是中国画学的绝异特要之处。假如中国画仅仅作为艺术作品(Work ofArt),当然有其“形式”上的追求。但中国画毕竟以“道与艺合、天与人一”的“斯文”传统为归宿,将性灵运成法,使成法养胸情,最终的追求并不是“形式”。所以,西方画学里那种形式上的贪新逐异、求奇变怪的“进步”或“进化”理论,不能作为研究中国 Mr. Xie Peiqiu Chen Peiqiu sea painting and calligraphy collection of life Tsz, editors, please add preface. Rush urgency, can not prepare Chen Therefore, as usual, talk to the heart of the direction. At the International Symposium on “Diffusion and Genesis”, I made the distinction between “Significant Form” and “Intrinsic Meaning”, thinking that the latter is a must for Chinese painting Very special place. If Chinese painting merely serves as a Work of Art, of course it has its own pursuit of “form”. However, after all, Chinese painting is based on the tradition of “Sven and Tradition” of “Taoism and Arts, Heaven and Man”, transforms the sexual spirit into law, and regulates the law so that the final pursuit is not “form” . Therefore, the “progressive” or “evolutionary” theory of formal corruption in western painting can not be used as a study of China