见于本刊第11期的“该不该向第三者索赔”一案一审已经判决。由于涉及个人隐私,法庭未公开审理此案。在被告韩玉未到庭应诉的情况下,法院依法缺席判决支持余梅的诉讼请求,判令韩玉败诉。此判决结果引起了很大争议。第三者问题在众说纷纭的道德讨论之后,开始提到法律的面前,法学界是如何看这一问题的? See No. 11 in this issue “This should not claim a third party ” case has been ruled in the first instance. Due to personal privacy, the court did not openly hear the case. In the case that defendant Han Yu did not appear in court, the court absent the judgment in support of Yu’s suit and ordered Han Yu to make a lawsuit. The result of this decision has caused much controversy. Third party issues Before the debates on law began after the controversial ethical discussions, how did the legal profession look at this issue?