论文部分内容阅读
近年来,常有商标权人或其授权代理商向工商机关投诉举报,或者向法院提起民事诉讼,称非授权经销商在门店或网店突出使用相关注册商标促销真品,易让消费者误认为授权特约店,损害了其注册商标声誉,构成商标侵权。司法实务中,各地法院对此类案件观点不一。本刊选取黄璞琳针对全国6个热点案例的审判研究,以激起学界对法律法规执行边界的探讨,促进社会良性快速发展。
In recent years, often trademark owners or their authorized agents to report complaints to the industrial and commercial authorities, or filed a civil lawsuit to the court, said non-authorized dealers in the store or shop highlight the use of the relevant registered trademarks of promotional genuine, easy for consumers to mistakenly believe Authorized shop, damaged its registered trademark reputation, constitutes a trademark infringement. In judicial practice, courts in different places have different opinions on such cases. The publication selected Huang Pulin for the six hot cases of trial research to arouse the academic circle of laws and regulations to explore the implementation of the boundary and promote sound and rapid social development.