论文部分内容阅读
2005-2006赛季的冠军联赛小组抽签结束后,阿布拉莫维奇掌控的切尔西就受到了欧足联和国际足联的责难,虽然欧足联、国际足联在很多事务上意见相左,但对于“阿布系”,两者站在了同一边。他们认为切尔西老板阿布在足球圈内摊子铺得过大,多家俱乐部都接受了他的赞助,因此和切尔西存在事实上的关联关系,这将威胁到足球运动的健康有序发展。欧足联CEO奥尔森表示:“如果阿布只向一家俱乐部投资,那么这丝毫没有问题。但我们不能允许一个个体或一个团体在参加欧洲赛事的两家或多家俱乐部占统治地位,如何证明或定义这种统治地位,是我们需要重点研究的。问题是如何区分俱乐部的所有权和一个人旗下的公司成为另一家俱乐部的赞助商间的关系。如果一个人在拥有一家俱乐部的同时,其旗下公司还是其他俱乐部赞助商,或者和其他俱乐部间存在联系,那将危及比赛,我们不能允许这种情况存在。”
Chelsea, under the control of Abramovich, was censored by UEFA and FIFA after the 2005-2006 season’s Champions League draw. While UEFA, FIFA have mixed opinions on many issues, “Abu system,” the two stood on the same side. They think Chelsea owner Abu in the football circle paved too large stalls, many clubs have accepted his sponsorship, so there is a de facto relationship with Chelsea, which will threaten the healthy and orderly development of football. Olson, CEO of UEFA, said: “If Abu could only invest in a club, that would be fine, but we can not allow an individual or a group to dominate at two or more clubs in Europe, Or define this dominance is something that we need to focus on.The problem is how to distinguish between the ownership of the club and the company of one person to become the sponsor of another club relationship.If a person has a club at the same time, The company is also a sponsor of other clubs, or is in contact with other clubs, which will endanger the game and we can not allow that to happen. ”