在登记生效主义模式下,登记具有公信力,不正确登记会导致善意取得之发生,并且导致国家对真正权利人的赔偿责任,这就迫使登记机构不得不对登记的事项,包括登记能力、权利来源、物权变动合意等进行审查,从而确保了正确土地登记簿的产生。理想地说,登记机关在审查时应该充分、及时、深入地了解当事人的权利状态,从而使规范真正地涵摄事实,成为事实的自我影像。但是,在有限理性的约束性条件下,这种理想永远无法实现。我们注定要生活在一个残缺不全的世界,我们运用理性来建构的规范世界永远不会和真实世界完全吻合。尤其是,由于登记的规范效力可以超越事实上的物权效力,不法之徒往往利用这一机制冒领他人权利,将他人的不动产据为己有或者以为抵 Under the registration validation model, the registration is credible and incorrect registration will lead to the acquisition of goodwill and lead to the state’s liability to the true owner. This will force the registration authority to restrict the registered items, including the registration ability, the source of rights, Such as changes in the right to review, in order to ensure the correct land register. Ideally, the registration authority should fully, timely and in-depth understand the rights and interests of the parties involved in the review so that the norms can truly capture the facts and become the self-image of the facts. However, this ideal can never be achieved under the restrictive conditions of bounded rationality. We are destined to live in a world with incompleteness. The normative world we construct with reason will never exactly match the real world. In particular, as the normative force of registration can go beyond the de facto effect of real rights, criminals often use this mechanism to take the rights of others, take others’ real property as their own,