论文部分内容阅读
本文从一个违宪的司法解释分析了我国现行的法律解释体制中存在的问题。我国《宪法》和法律明确规定了全国人大、全国人大常委会、最高人民法院的职权,及其在法律解释体系中所处的不同地位。然而,在司法实践中,全国人大常委会长期怠于行使其法律解释权,最高人民法院不断地作出各种司法解释来应对新情况。为了解决法律条文与司法解释之间的效力冲突,我们应当重新明确规定各个主体如何行使其解释权,真正做到“有法可依、有法必依”。
This article analyzes the existing problems in the legal interpretation system of our country from a constitutional judicial interpretation. Our Constitution and laws clearly stipulate the powers and responsibilities of the NPC, the NPC Standing Committee and the Supreme People’s Court and their different positions in the legal interpretation system. However, in judicial practice, the NPC Standing Committee has lagged in exercising its power of legal interpretation for a long period of time. The Supreme People’s Court has continuously made various judicial interpretations to deal with the new situation. In order to resolve the conflict of validity between legal provisions and judicial interpretation, we should redefine clearly how each subject should exercise its power of interpretation, so that “there is law to be followed and there is law to follow.”