目的对应用吻合器吻合术与Dixon手术两种方式对患有直肠癌疾病的患者实施治疗的临床效果进行对比研究。方法选择在新郑市人民医院就诊的患有直肠癌疾病的患者92例,随机分为对照组和治疗组,平均每组46例。采用传统Dixon手术方式对对照组患者实施治疗;采用吻合器吻合术对治疗组患者实施治疗。结果治疗组患者在手术治疗后出现吻合口瘘和吻合口狭窄等并发症的人数明显少于对照组;直肠癌疾病手术治疗效果明显优于对照组。结论应用吻合器吻合术方式对患有直肠癌疾病的患者实施治疗的临床效果非常明显。 Objective To compare the clinical effects of stapled anastomosis and Dixon surgery on patients with rectal cancer. Methods 92 patients with rectal cancer who were treated in Xinzheng People’s Hospital were randomly divided into control group and treatment group, with an average of 46 in each group. The patients in the control group were treated by traditional Dixon operation. The patients in the treatment group were treated by stapler anastomosis. Results In the treatment group, the number of complications such as anastomotic fistula and anastomotic stenosis were significantly less than those in the control group after operation. The surgical treatment of rectal cancer was significantly better than the control group. Conclusion The clinical effect of applying stapler anastomosis to patients with rectal cancer is very obvious.