论文部分内容阅读
给材料作文,是中学作文训练与测试中的常见题型。写好给材料作文,审题立意是关键,而分析材料又是审题立意的基础。如果分析材料这个环节搞得不好,或浅尝辄止,或望文生义,那么审题立意就难免发生肤浅、片面的毛病。下面来看几个例子。 例1 俗话说:“一个巧皮匠,没有好鞋样;两个笨皮匠,彼此有商量;三个臭皮匠,抵个诸葛亮。”民谚云:“一个和尚挑水喝,两个和尚抬水喝,三个和尚没水喝。”——请以《“皮匠”与“和尚”》为题,写一篇辩证析理的议论文。
Writing essays is a common question in secondary school composition training and testing. Writing well for the composition of the material, reviewing the concept is the key, and the analysis of the material is the basis for the conception. If the analysis of this material is not done well, or if you try to avoid it, or if you want to read the text, then you will inevitably have superficial and one-sided problems. Let’s look at a few examples below. Example 1 As the saying goes: “A cute cobbler does not have a good shoe; two stupid cobblers consult with each other; three heads are handed to Zhuge Liang.” Min Yun: “A monk carries water to drink, and two monks carry water to drink. The three monks had no water to drink.“ - Please use the title ”“Cobbler” and “Monk”" to write a discourse on dialectical analysis.