论文部分内容阅读
立案登记制的确立,虽使行政诉讼门槛大大降低,但也导致了诉权滥用现象日益严重,且尤以政府信息公开案件最为突出。2015年《最高人民法院公报》第11期刊登的“陆红霞诉南通市发展和改革委员会政府信息公开答复案”中,基层人民法院发挥司法能动性,在尚无明确法律规范的情况下,为规制政府信息公开案件中诉权滥用提供了一条可供借鉴的司法道路。但本案仍有可待商榷之处,如法院主动取证问题、政府信息未分类对待、裁判模式有失公允等。通过比较法研究,以最高院《关于进一步推进案件繁简分流优化司法资源配置的若干意见》(以下简称《意见》)为抓手,可通过完善行政诉讼诉讼费用承担制度规制滥诉行为。
Although the establishment of the filing registration system has greatly reduced the threshold of administrative litigation, it has also led to the growing abuse of the right to abuse and the most prominent case of government information disclosure. In the “Public Opinion on Public Information of the Government of Lu Hongxia v. Nantong Development and Reform Commission” published in the 11th bulletin of the Supreme People’s Court in 2015, the grassroots people’s courts exert the judicial initiative and, in the absence of any clear legal norms, Regulating the abuse of the right to appeal in the case of government information disclosure provides a judicial path to learn from. However, the case is still open to question, such as the court’s initiative to collect evidence, the government information is not classified, and the judgment model is unfair. Through the study of comparative law, the Supreme People’s Court, “Several Opinions on Further Promoting the Streamlining of Tributaries and Optimizing the Allocation of Judicial Resources” (hereinafter referred to as “Opinions”) can improve the system of charging for administrative litigation costs by regulating the cost of administrative litigation.