论文部分内容阅读
指正《中国古方志考》《广西方志编纂史》中一些方志时代归属、类别归属的错误。两书认为《广西会要》《广西郡邑图志》属于通志类方志,无据可证。《广西方志编纂史》列举了21部唐代广西的图经,但事实上《邕州图经》等图经不一定是唐代的。两书对许多方志有所考释,但仍存在许多需要补充考释之处。将《邕管杂记》等列为方志类,是错误的,应为地理类杂志之属。
Correction of “ancient Chinese Zhishi test” “Guangxi local history” in some ching chi era belongs to the category attribution error. The two books that “Guangxi will be” “Guangxi Yi county map” belongs to Annals class Zhi, no evidence. The History of Compilation of Guangxi Local Records lists 21 maps of Guangxi in the Tang Dynasty, but in fact the maps such as the Map of the Trips of Zhuozhou are not necessarily the Tang Dynasty. There are many texts that have been examined and explained by both books, but there are still many areas that need supplementary explanations. The “miscellaneous notes” and other recorded as a category of chi, is wrong, should belong to geography magazine.