论文部分内容阅读
对危险驾驶致人死伤的行为定性存在主、客观标准。主观标准认为危险驾驶者对死伤结果持过失时成立交通肇事罪,持故意时成立以危险方法危害公共安全罪,但该标准建立在对刑法条文错误解释的基础上,且没有提供合理的具体判断方法。客观标准主张以危险驾驶行为本身对公共安全带来的危险程度来区分危险驾驶致人死亡构成何罪,并对《刑法》第114条和第115条第1、2款的关系作出了合理解读,有利于法益保护。在具体运用上,客观标准主张在进行“相当性”判断时,不能偏离公共安全这一保护法益,且应以危险驾驶行为本身的严重性和该行为对公共安全的影响范围和程度作为判断材料,进行综合考量。
There are qualitative and objective criteria for the death-injury caused by dangerous driving. The subjective standard holds that a dangerous driver is guilty of setting off a traffic accident when the result of a death or injury is negligent, and setting up a crime of endangering public safety by a dangerous method when deliberately negligent, but the standard is based on the erroneous interpretation of the provisions of the criminal law and does not provide reasonable concrete judgment method. Objective standards advocate that the dangerous behavior of dangerous driving itself to public safety to distinguish between dangerous death caused by driving what constitutes a crime, and Article 114 of the “Criminal Law” and Article 115, paragraph 1, paragraph 2 of the relationship between a reasonable interpretation , Is conducive to legal protection. In the concrete application, the objective standards advocate that the judgment of “equivalence” should not deviate from the law of protection of public safety, and should regard the seriousness of the dangerous driving behavior and the extent and extent of its impact on public safety as Judgment materials, a comprehensive consideration.