论文部分内容阅读
常年性变应性鼻炎、非变应性鼻炎患者及正常人３组各２５例鼻粘膜激发试验前后及溶媒对照后的鼻阻力测定结果（正常人不作激发）．并将其与症状评分进行比较。溶媒对照后，３组受试者中６０％以上引起鼻部症状，这可能与鼻腔机械性刺激有关。若将症状评分标准提高，虽可提高诊断的准确性，但阳性率降低，故单以症状评分评定激发试验不十分准确，且受主观因素影响。常年性变应性鼻炎组激发前后鼻阻力有显著变化；溶媒对照则无显著性。非变应性鼻炎组及对照组则不同。因而认为，鼻阻力测定是评定鼻粘膜激发试验较为准确、客观的方法。
Perennial allergic rhinitis, non-allergic rhinitis patients and normal group 3 25 cases of nasal mucosal stimulation test before and after the nasal resistance test results (normal without stimulation). And compare it with the symptom score. After vehicle control, more than 60% of the three groups of subjects caused nasal symptoms, which may be related to nasal mechanical stimulation. If the symptom score increased, although the diagnostic accuracy can be improved, but the positive rate is reduced, so the assessment of symptom score excitation test is not very accurate, and subject to subjective factors. Perennial allergic rhinitis group before and after stimulation of nasal resistance had significant changes; vehicle control was not significant. Non-allergic rhinitis group and control group are different. Therefore, the nasal resistance test is to assess the nasal mucosal excitation test more accurate and objective method.