论文部分内容阅读
从适用的主体、对象、基础以及程序等方面来看,《反恐怖主义法》第三十条规定的“安置教育”是独立于刑法的保安处分措施,在许多方面与德国刑法规定的保安监督类似。就有效预防恐怖主义、极端主义思想的传播与影响而言,安置教育有着积极意义与正面价值,应该予以肯定。但是,安置教育在实体方面存在适用对象扩大化、适用时间无期化与适用前提形式化的风险,适用程序的透明性与有效性也有待于提高。为了充分发挥“安置教育”的积极作用,应该通过法律解释或者实施细则对之予以完善,例如适当限制其适用的前提与对象、规定最高期限、完善危险评估机制,赋予被适用对象质疑风险评估结论的机会。
In terms of applicable subjects, objects, bases and procedures, the “placement education” stipulated in Article 30 of the “Anti-Terrorism Law” is a measure of security measures independent of the criminal law and is in many ways in keeping with the provisions of German criminal law Security supervision is similar. In order to effectively prevent the spread and influence of terrorism and extremism, resettlement education has positive and positive values and should be affirmed. However, there is a risk that the resettlement education will expand its scope of application, apply unscheduled periods of time and form the applicable premises, and the transparency and effectiveness of applicable procedures need to be improved. In order to give full play to the positive role of “resettlement education”, it should be improved through legal interpretation or implementation details, such as appropriately restricting the applicable premises and objects, setting a maximum deadline, perfecting the risk assessment mechanism and giving the applied subject the risk of being questioned The chance to evaluate the conclusion.