论文部分内容阅读
在有关市场秩序形成机制的理论传统中,存在自发论和建构论的二元对立。立足中国社会市场化转型的特殊经验,也形成了一批富有本土特色的理论创见。本文将在梳理市场秩序形成的自发论、建构论以及本土经验论三种理论逻辑的基础之上,提出一个整合自发性与建构性的互动实践框架,用于分析中国市场化改革的经验历程。在中国社会的转型过程中,自发性与建构性两种力量以不同的互动关系机制塑造了实践中的市场秩序形态。在市场秩序的兴起阶段,存在民间自发主体的规则创新与官方建构主体的立法确认二者之间的前后相继;在市场秩序的拓展阶段,存在以市场效率为导向的优胜劣汰与以政治偏好为导向的地方规划两种制度选择机制的左右互搏;在市场秩序的变革阶段,存在地方政府突破体制壁垒的制度创新与企业重塑市场惯习的规则创新之间的相辅相成。
In the theoretical tradition of the formation mechanism of market order, there exists a binary opposition between spontaneous theory and constructivism. Based on the special experience of the market-oriented transformation of Chinese society, a number of theoretical innovations rich in local characteristics have also formed. Based on the three theories of spontaneity, constructivism and indigenous empiricism formed by the market order, this article proposes an interactive practice framework that integrates spontaneity and constructivism to analyze the experience of market-oriented reform in China. In the process of social transformation in China, both spontaneous and constructive forces have shaped the practice of market order with different mechanisms of interaction. In the rising stage of the market order, there exists the order of the rule innovation of spontaneous subjective body and the legislative confirmation of the main body of official establishment. In the stage of expanding market order, there exists the survival of the fittest, oriented by market efficiency, and the preference of political preference In the stage of the reform of the market order, there is a complementarity between the institutional innovation of the local government in breaking institutional barriers and the rule innovation of the enterprises in reshaping the market habit.