论文部分内容阅读
Discussions surrounding overcapacity at the just- concluded G20 Summit in Hangzhou， east China’s Zhejiang Province， indicate that the problem has caught the attention of the world’s leading economies. However， few concrete action plans to mitigate the impact of overcapacity on world economic growth were crafted. This demonstrates that the international community has yet to surmount a number of obstacles.
Overcapacity exists in a number of sectors， particularly in the oil， iron and steel， coal， cement and solar panel industries. However， few countries have taken actions to cut overcapacity for fear of affecting their economic growth for the worse. Despite that， during the B20 Summit， which gathered business leaders from around the world on September 3， President Xi Jinping reiterated China’s goal to cut another 100 million to 150 million tons of crude steel capacity in five years.
The problem is that economies often fail to recognize their own problems and instead lay blame on others. European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker， for instance， suggested on September 4 that China accept a monitoring and supervision mechanism for overproduction in the iron and steel sector from the international community. He also said that the European Commission will continue its anti-dumping measures against China’s steel products so as to protect the steel industry and workers of the EU.
As a matter of fact， industrial overcapacity is a global issue that all countries should confront together. Take the steel industry， for example. It relies on major iron ore producers such as Australia， Brazil and India as well as on primary steel producers like China， the EU， Japan， India， the United States and Russia. Asking just one of those countries to reduce its output won’t solve the problem. The best solution would be for all countries to make concerted efforts toward addressing overcapacity.
Cutting an afflicted industry’s overall production capacity is often regarded as the only way to address such problems. Contrary to this conventional wisdom， the most effective solution is derived from a combination of increasing the demand for the product while curbing output.
As the second largest economy in the world， China has overcapacity issues. Since there was a large amount of resource-based investment during China’s rapid economic expansion in the past few decades， the steel， coal and non-ferrous metal sectors have not only developed massive new capacities， but also high inventory levels. Overcapacity and high inventory levels have become a drag on the country’s growth. China therefore introduced its supply-side reform policy at the end of 2015 in a bid to mend the problem. China is the first among the major world economies to cut excess capacity， and on multiple occasions， the Chinese Government has called on the international community to address economic issues through collaboration.
On the one hand， negotiations can be carried out between various countries’ trade associations to cap the levels of steel production， imports and exports of those countries involved. For instance， the China Iron and Steel Association can reach a consensus with peers in other countries concerning these problems through negotiation. It should be noted that international industrial capacity cooperation should be equal and mutually beneficial as well as take into consideration the relevant countries’ development needs.
On the other hand， countries can work together to expand market demand. Industrial overcapacity primarily exists in major economies. Many developing countries that would like to improve their people’s livelihoods have large market potential but no capital， large demand but no products. Therefore， countries burdened with overcapacity can make use of the markets in these areas.
The Belt and Road Initiative launched by China provides great opportunities for cutting overcapacity. The initiative is not designed to transfer excess stock， but to increase demand and promote prosperity in countries involved.
Nevertheless， there are multiple problems surrounding international efforts to combat overcapacity， which cannot be resolved overnight. During the 18th ChinaEU Summit held in July in Beijing， China accepted the EU’s proposal to form a working group to seek solutions to the problem. China will allow the EU to monitor and supervise China’s steel prices， export volumes and the nation’s subsidies to steel plants in order to help them decide whether China has taken effective measures to address and reduce overcapacity. This showcases China’s commitment to tackling the issue through international cooperation.
During the G20 Summit， world leaders agreed to establish a global forum on excess steel supplies. It is hoped that such a project can be initiated as soon as possible， especially since steel workers in Europe are losing their jobs and many of their Chinese counterparts have been laid off or transferred to other posts. It’s time for countries to discuss together strengthening overcapacity reduction and cooperation efforts.
Overcapacity exists in a number of sectors， particularly in the oil， iron and steel， coal， cement and solar panel industries. However， few countries have taken actions to cut overcapacity for fear of affecting their economic growth for the worse. Despite that， during the B20 Summit， which gathered business leaders from around the world on September 3， President Xi Jinping reiterated China’s goal to cut another 100 million to 150 million tons of crude steel capacity in five years.
The problem is that economies often fail to recognize their own problems and instead lay blame on others. European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker， for instance， suggested on September 4 that China accept a monitoring and supervision mechanism for overproduction in the iron and steel sector from the international community. He also said that the European Commission will continue its anti-dumping measures against China’s steel products so as to protect the steel industry and workers of the EU.
As a matter of fact， industrial overcapacity is a global issue that all countries should confront together. Take the steel industry， for example. It relies on major iron ore producers such as Australia， Brazil and India as well as on primary steel producers like China， the EU， Japan， India， the United States and Russia. Asking just one of those countries to reduce its output won’t solve the problem. The best solution would be for all countries to make concerted efforts toward addressing overcapacity.
Cutting an afflicted industry’s overall production capacity is often regarded as the only way to address such problems. Contrary to this conventional wisdom， the most effective solution is derived from a combination of increasing the demand for the product while curbing output.
As the second largest economy in the world， China has overcapacity issues. Since there was a large amount of resource-based investment during China’s rapid economic expansion in the past few decades， the steel， coal and non-ferrous metal sectors have not only developed massive new capacities， but also high inventory levels. Overcapacity and high inventory levels have become a drag on the country’s growth. China therefore introduced its supply-side reform policy at the end of 2015 in a bid to mend the problem. China is the first among the major world economies to cut excess capacity， and on multiple occasions， the Chinese Government has called on the international community to address economic issues through collaboration.
On the one hand， negotiations can be carried out between various countries’ trade associations to cap the levels of steel production， imports and exports of those countries involved. For instance， the China Iron and Steel Association can reach a consensus with peers in other countries concerning these problems through negotiation. It should be noted that international industrial capacity cooperation should be equal and mutually beneficial as well as take into consideration the relevant countries’ development needs.
On the other hand， countries can work together to expand market demand. Industrial overcapacity primarily exists in major economies. Many developing countries that would like to improve their people’s livelihoods have large market potential but no capital， large demand but no products. Therefore， countries burdened with overcapacity can make use of the markets in these areas.
The Belt and Road Initiative launched by China provides great opportunities for cutting overcapacity. The initiative is not designed to transfer excess stock， but to increase demand and promote prosperity in countries involved.
Nevertheless， there are multiple problems surrounding international efforts to combat overcapacity， which cannot be resolved overnight. During the 18th ChinaEU Summit held in July in Beijing， China accepted the EU’s proposal to form a working group to seek solutions to the problem. China will allow the EU to monitor and supervise China’s steel prices， export volumes and the nation’s subsidies to steel plants in order to help them decide whether China has taken effective measures to address and reduce overcapacity. This showcases China’s commitment to tackling the issue through international cooperation.
During the G20 Summit， world leaders agreed to establish a global forum on excess steel supplies. It is hoped that such a project can be initiated as soon as possible， especially since steel workers in Europe are losing their jobs and many of their Chinese counterparts have been laid off or transferred to other posts. It’s time for countries to discuss together strengthening overcapacity reduction and cooperation efforts.