一、用社会主义有计划的商品经济观念来更新我国邮电事业的旧观念研究邮电价格(资费)理论,无法回避邮电部门性质的讨论和确定。解放后,我国邮电部门的性质有过一场争论,即邮电是服务性的事业还是经营性的企业。当时左的指导思想占支配地位,只准提服务,不准提经营,并批评了主张经营的观点。有一种说法,认为公共事业天生是为社会服务的,只能讲“社会效益”。赚钱固然要服务,赔钱也要服务,邮电既是公共事业,“赔钱服务”是天经地义理所当然的。这里把公共事业同经营公共事业赔不赔钱的两个性质不同的问题混为一谈,使邮电职工又多了一条思想桎梏。五十年代开始搞计划经济,把苏联那套否定商品经济、搞自然经济论的“产品经济”理论和生产资料低价政策搬过来,成为邮电部门内内外外的错误教条,这种影响至今还在某些人的脑子起作用,“君不见苏联 I. Renewing the Old Concept of China’s Posts and Telecommunications with the Concept of a Socialist and Planned Commodity Economy Studying the theory of post and telecommunications prices (tariffs) can not sidestep the discussion and determination of the nature of post and telecommunications. After the liberation, the nature of China’s post and telecommunications sector has had a debate that the postal service is a service or a business enterprise. At that time, the guiding ideology of the left occupied the dominant position and only allowed service. It was not allowed to mention running a business and criticized the point of view of running a business. There is a saying that public utilities are inherently social services, can only say “social benefits.” Of course, to make money, but also lose money service, postal and telecommunications are both public utilities, “money service” is a matter of course. Here the confused issue between public utilities and the different nature of running public utilities does not make any difference, so that postal workers have more thoughts. In the 1950s, when the planned economy was started, the “product economy” theory of the Soviet Union, which deny commodity economy and nature economics, and the low-cost policy of means of production were moved in to become the wrong dogma inside and outside the post and telecommunications departments. As of today, In the minds of some people, "Do not you see the Soviet Union