编辑,你好:我是名回乡创业的大学生。前不久,我突然接到已被解聘的员工李某的起诉状,要求支付其被拖欠的半年工资。在法庭上,我告诉法官,我每月5日前都当面如数付清李某上个月的工资,李某要求我出示支付工资的证据。因为我都是当面付他工资,没有证据。最后,法院判决支持了李某的诉讼请求。请问,法院的判决有不当之处吗?婷娜婷娜读者:法院的判决并无不当。《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》第二条规定:“当事人对自己提出的诉讼请 Hello, editor, I am a college student who started her own business. Not long ago, I suddenly received a dismissed employee Lee’s complaint, asking for payment of their arrears of six months salary. In court, I told the judge that every month before the 5th of each month, I paid Lee last month ’s salary in full and Lee asked me to show evidence of payment of wages. Because I paid my salary in person, there is no evidence. Finally, the court ruling supported Lee’s claim. Excuse me, is there anything wrong with the court’s judgment? Tingna Tingna Reader: The court’s judgment is not inappropriate. Article 2 of the Supreme People’s Court’s Several Provisions on Evidence in Civil Proceedings states: ”The litigant’s petitions against himself