论文部分内容阅读
一、怎样看待私塾先生和作者对他的态度? 有人认为文中所写的私塾先生是鲁迅童年时代的老师寿镜吾先生,并以有关他的事迹来说明寿先生对鲁迅的关怀和鲁迅对他的尊敬,从而认为鲁迅在文章中对私塾先生是抱肯定态度的;也有人把先生看成是可憎可笑的反面人物。应该怎样看待私塾先生这个形象呢? 《从百草园到三味书屋》是一篇文艺性的散文,虽然鲁迅在写私塾先生中有现实生活中寿先生的某些事实依据,但鲁迅并不是给寿镜吾写传记。为了表达作品主题思想的需要,作者选取了有关寿先生教学生活的某些材料,这样,与实际生活中的寿先生的全貌就不可能完全一致。分析私塾先生的形象,应以作品为依据。
First, what do you think of Mr. Private School and the author’s attitude towards him? Someone thinks that the private school teacher written in the text is Mr. Shou Jingwu, Lu Xun’s childhood teacher, and explains his concern for Lu Xun with his stories about him and Lu Xun’s treatment of him. The respect, therefore, thinks that Lu Xun holds a positive attitude toward Mr. Private School in his article; others also regard him as a ridiculous negative person. How should I look at the image of Mr. Private? From “Baicaoyuan to Sanwei Bookstore” is a literary essay. Although Lu Xun has some factual basis for real life Mr. Shou in his writing Mr. Lu Xun, but Lu Xun does not give shou. Mirror I wrote a biography. In order to express the need for the theme of the work, the author selected certain materials concerning Mr. Shou’s teaching life. In this way, it is impossible to completely agree with Mr. Shou’s overall appearance in real life. The analysis of Mr. Private School’s image should be based on the work.