论文部分内容阅读
在西方国家,证据法的跨学科研究是为了弥补和回应传统证据法教义学在应对相关问题上存在的不足,应运而生的。由于证据法本身的学科特性,与一般意义上的法学跨学科研究相比,证据法跨学科研究显得更为彻底也更为开放。证据法教义学研究与跨学科研究在关注对象、研究方法、知识资源和开放程度方面均存在很大的差异,两者存在既竞争又互补的关系。我国的证据法学研究在当前背景下面临证据法规范建构和司法证明过程控制的双重任务,这决定了证据法教义学、证据法比较法研究和证据法跨学科研究三足鼎立的研究格局。我国的证据法跨学科研究已经具备了初步的学科建制基础并产出了初步的成果,但是也存在本土化不足、跨学科资源还未充分整合等隐患。
In western countries, the interdisciplinary research in evidence law is to make up for and respond to the deficiencies existing in the traditional evidence law teachings in coping with related issues. Due to the disciplinary nature of evidence law itself, evidence law is more thorough and more open than interdisciplinary research in jurisprudence. Evidence-based jurisprudence research and interdisciplinary research are very different in their attention, research methods, knowledge resources and openness, both of which exist in a competitive and complementary relationship. Under the current background, the research of evidence jurisprudence in our country faces the dual tasks of standard construction of evidence law and process control of judicial evidence, which determines the research pattern of the three pillars of the doctrine of evidence law, comparative law of evidence law and interdisciplinary law of evidence law. Our country’s evidence law interdisciplinary research already has the foundation of the initial disciplines and produced the initial results, but there are also problems such as insufficient localization and insufficient integration of interdisciplinary resources.