伦敦中部的交通堵塞费是以政策干预限制交通、减少拥堵的极端例子。本文将伦敦的情况放在社会科学理论语境中 ,用批判实用主义的概念 ,特别是借鉴福林布杰格 (Flyvbjerg)和弗莱斯特 (Forester)对个案研究材料的利用 ,简述伦敦的交通堵塞费计划 ,并分析其实施过程。文章涉及对相关问题的协商、陈述和回应 ,以及两家主要代表的不同观点 ,从平等与分配、可接受性、边界效应以及对环境的影响等方面对个案进行分析 ,由此回归社会科学理论的意义 ,并指出价值理性和权力的观念应包含公平与承诺 Traffic congestion in central London is an extreme example of policy restrictions that restrict traffic and reduce congestion. In this article, we put the situation in London in the context of the social sciences theory and use the critique of the concept of pragmatism, especially the use of case study materials by Flyvbjerg and Forester, Traffic congestion fee plan and analyze its implementation process. The article deals with consultations, presentations and responses on related issues, as well as the different perspectives of the two major representatives. It analyzes individual cases in terms of equality and distribution, acceptability, border effects and environmental impact, and thus returns to the social science theory And pointed out that the concept of value rationality and power should include fairness and commitment