论文部分内容阅读
对中华医学杂志1993年第73卷1～11期刊出的128篇论著以及126篇简报类论文的542张审稿单,按其审稿的质量、审回的时间以及论文1年内刊出率等进行综合的统计分析。根据《中华医学杂志审稿要求》制订的原则,将审稿分为优、一般、差三种。1.审稿人稿件在1个月内审回(一般要求在2周内),对建议刊用或退稿的文章提出具体的理由和具体的修改意见为优。2.稿件在2个半月内审回,没有明确自己的见解,只是笼统地提出简单的修改意见为一般。3.稿件审回时间在2个半月以上,没有提及
Of the 128 articles published in the 73st issue of China Medical Association, Volume 73, Issue 1, and November 1993, as well as 542 review draft papers of 126 briefing papers, the quality of reviewers, the time of review and the rate of publication in one year Conduct a comprehensive statistical analysis. According to the “Chinese Medical Journal reviewers requirements” to develop the principle of review will be divided into excellent, general, poor three. 1. Reviewers’ manuscripts should be reviewed within one month (usually within two weeks), and specific justification and specific amendments are recommended for the articles recommended for publication or rejection. 2. Manuscripts reviewed within two and a half months, did not clear their own views, but general proposed a simple amendment to the general. Manuscript review time in more than two and a half months, did not mention