论文部分内容阅读
长期在牙膏、口香糖广告中频频露脸的权威机构——全国牙病防治指导组(简称“牙防组”)竟然无认证资格、无专职人员。从1988年成立至今,这个组织不知“权威”认证了多少个品牌。而现在,全国消费者在哗然之余,心头又多了一些疑问:牙防组何以堂而皇之认证了如此之久?它的运作靠什么支撑?前不久的诉讼案去向如何?对于这一切,消费者有权知道。今年2月17日,上海律师陈江一纸诉状将全国牙防组等4被告起诉至上海市闵行区法院,要求超市停止销售乐天木糖醇口香糖、赔偿17.6元等,理由是:全国牙防组对乐天木糖醇口香糖作出的认证涉嫌欺诈及误导宣传。事实上,法律界人士对全国牙防组为口腔保健用品认证的质疑早已出现。清华大学法学博士、中国公益诉讼网主编李刚也于去年在北京提起相似诉讼,矛头直指全国牙防组。
Long-term toothpaste, chewing gum advertising frequently appeared in the face of the authority - the National Dental Disease Prevention Group (“Dafu”) even without certification, no full-time staff. Since its inception in 1988, this organization does not know how many brands the “authority” has certified. And now, the nation’s consumers are in an uproar, with some more questions in mind: How modest the Accademic Defense Accreditation has been for so long? How is its operation supported? What has been the recent lawsuit? For all this, consumers Have the right to know. February 17 this year, Shanghai lawyer Chen Jiang a paper petition the National Defendment Unit and other 4 defendants sued to the Shanghai Minhang District Court, requiring the supermarket to stop marketing Lotte xylitol chewing gum, compensation 17.6 yuan, on the grounds that: the National Defense The group’s certification of Lotto xylitol chewing gum was suspected of fraud and misleading publicity. In fact, legal professionals have long questioned the National Dental Defense Agency’s certification of oral hygiene products. Li Gang, a law doctor at Tsinghua University and editor-in-chief of China’s Public Welfare Lawsuit, also filed a similar lawsuit in Beijing last year, targeting the National Dental Defense Team.