论文部分内容阅读
《光明日报》自一九六二年十二月二十九日发表穆欣的文章《不应当替投降变节行为辯护》,对孔尚任的《桃花扇》提出重新评价之后,去年十月十八日和今年一月十七日又相继发表两篇文章,就正确评价《桃花扇》的问题,进行了讨论。陈毓羆在《应该正确评价孔尚任的〈桃花扇〉》一文中,批驳了关于《桃花扇》具有“爱国主义思想”,反映了“历史矛盾的本质”等错误论点。文章根据孔尚任的诗文及其所做所为证明孔尚任对清朝统治是完全拥护的。这样的御用文人根本不可能具有缅怀明代、反对清朝的“爱国主义思想”,相反,为了服务于清朝
Since Guangming Daily published a speech by Mu Xin on December 29, 1962, “should not defend the surrender of the capitulation,” after re-evaluating Kong Shangren’s “Peach Blossom Fan,” last October 18 On January 17 and January 17 this year, two articles were published in succession to discuss the correct evaluation of the Peach Blossom Fan. In his article entitled “Peach Blossom Fan”, which should be appraised by Kong Shangren, Chen Yu 批 rejects such erroneous arguments that Peach Blossom Fan possesses “patriotism” and “the essence of historical contradictions”. According to Kong Shangren’s poetry and his works, the article proves that Kong Shangren completely supports the rule of the Qing Dynasty. Such imperial scholar simply can not cherish the memory of the Ming Dynasty and oppose the Qing Dynasty’s “patriotism”. On the contrary, in order to serve the Qing Dynasty