论文部分内容阅读
戈德曼认为,认知科学通过揭穿计划而与形而上学相关。而本文认为,第一,认知科学不是特别地只与形而上学相关,而是普遍地与任何运用直觉的理智探究相关;第二,在揭穿计划中,形而上学本身与认知科学一道发挥着关键作用。因为,揭穿计划的一个关键部分是选择在什么情况下进行揭穿,而选择在什么情况下进行揭穿的一个关键部分是评估这个直觉是否与实在相符合,这种评估是形而上学的评估。因此,在更广泛的揭穿计划中,认知科学和形而上学是一对搭档。与“认知科学与形而上学的相关性”这个戈德曼的用语相比,“认知科学和形而上学与更宽泛的揭穿直觉之计划的联合相关性”这个表述更不易产生误导。
Goldman argues that cognitive science is metaphysically related by exposing the plan. This paper argues that, first, cognitive science is not particularly metaphysical but rather generally associated with any rational inquiry that uses intuition; and second, metaphysics itself plays a key role in cognitive science in debunking programs . Because a crucial part of the exposure plan is the circumstances under which it is debatable, and a key part of the choice of circumstances under which it is exposed is a metaphysical assessment of whether this intuition corresponds to reality. As a result, cognitive science and metaphysics are the partners in the broader debacle program. The expression “co-relatedness of cognitive science and metaphysics to a broader program of exposing intuition” is less likely to be misleading compared to the Goldman terminology of “relevance of cognitive science and metaphysics.”