论文部分内容阅读
放马滩秦简《丹》篇,以邸丞上书的方式,叙说了一个死而复生的故事。复生故事在简牍文献中少见,又与后世志怪故事有渊源关系,因而备受研究者重视。然而关于文中所指涉的年代,各家说法不一,主要有秦纪年和赵纪年等说法,秦纪年之下又有不同的王世之争。今对以上各说进行检视,发现其结论均有不可自圆其说之处。本文在重新理解简文部分词句的基础上,提出《丹》篇最初为一篇魏国文献,篇首纪年为魏昭王八年。
Put Mahatan Qin “Dan” articles, to Di Cheng way of writing, narrated a story of the resurrection. Resurrection stories rare in the literature, but also with future generations of strange stories have a genetic relationship, which attracted much attention of researchers. However, regarding the era referred to in the article, the various opinions vary from one genre to the other, mainly including the statements of Qin Jianyin and Zhao Jiyin, and the reign of Wang Shi under Qin years. This review of the above said, found that the conclusions are not justified. Based on the re-understanding of the essays in the essay, this article proposes that “Dan” was originally a Wei-Wei literature, and the first year of the essay was the eighth year of Wei Zhao.