读刘国松先生在《美术研究》今年第一期发表的《中国绘画基本观念之我见》一文后,我有一些不同看法。我愿借此机会共同商榷一下,并求教于同行们。 以“开放”论文化艺术发展的盛衰,有失切当 刘国松先生认为:“中国绘画曾经领导世界艺术达七百年以上”。我看并无史实依据。唐宋文化并不是由于对外开放才走向繁荣,因为这种有限度的“开放”,从殷周、两汉、南北朝、唐宋直至明清,始终有之。唐宋文化的发展,主要是由于经济的繁荣、政治的开明和对文艺的奖励、宽容政策,才促使其在固有文化艺术成就积累的基础上有了蓬勃的发展,在某些方面达到了历史上的最高峰。并不是由于什么“开放”(更不同于今天的 After reading the article entitled “My Opinion on the Basic Concepts of Chinese Painting” published by Mr. Liu Guosong in the first issue of the “Art Research” this year, I have some different opinions. I would like to take this opportunity to discuss and seek advice from my colleagues. To “open” on the rise and fall of the development of culture and art, there is a mistake when Mr. Liu Guosong think: “Chinese painting has led the world art for more than seven hundred years.” I think there is no historical basis. The Tang and Song dynasties did not prosper only as a result of opening to the outside world. This limited “opening up” has always existed from the Yin and Zhou Dynasties, the Han dynasties, the Southern and Northern Dynasties, the Tang and Song Dynasties to the Ming and Qing Dynasties. The development of the Tang and Song dynasties mainly resulted from the flourishing economy, the enlightened liberal politics and the rewards and tolerance policy of literature and art, which promoted the vigorous development of the culture of Song and Song dynasties based on the accumulation of the achievements in culture and art and reached some aspects in history The highest peak on. Not because of what is “open” (more so than today’s