盛洪同志在《经济研究》1991年第1期发表的《寻求改革的稳定形式》一文(以下简称盛文),探讨了改革的稳定性与利益均衡的关系。但笔者认为,文中提出的计划权利和计划义务货币化、产权化的设想,在理论上既难以成立,在实践上也是弊多利少。为此有必要提出几点不同意见。第一,计划权利和计划义务本身并不包含“价值内容”,因此将计划权利和计划义务货币 In his article entitled “Towards a stable form of reform” (hereinafter referred to as Sheng Wen) published by Economic Research, No. 1, 1991, Comrade Sheng Hong explored the relationship between the stability of the reform and the balance of interests. However, in my opinion, the idea of ​​monetarization and property right proposed in this paper is not only difficult to set up theoretically, but it is also more effective and less harmful in practice. To this end it is necessary to make a few different opinions. First, planning rights and planning obligations do not themselves include “value content,” so the right to plan and the obligation to plan the currency