上世纪八九十年代,当拉美经济深陷经济危机与债务危机而不能自拔时,政府管制与贸易保护成为众多学者批评拉美模式的主要理由。然而次贷危机发生以来,在欧美国家有很多类似于拉美模式的政府干预与贸易保护的政策选择现象。根据拉美模式的演进发展历程,应当说管制与贸易保护其实是拉美模式中非常重要的政策选择,是拉美国家实现经济发展的合理选择,而非自由主义者所批评的拉美危机的原凶。 In the 1980s and 1990s, when Latin American economy was deeply trapped by the economic crisis and the debt crisis, government regulation and trade protection became the main reason that many scholars criticized the Latin American model. However, since the subprime mortgage crisis occurred, there are many policy choices similar to the Latin American model of government intervention and trade protection in Europe and the United States. According to the evolution of the Latin American model, it should be said that control and protection of trade are actually very important policy choices in the Latin American model. They are a reasonable choice for Latin American countries to achieve economic development, rather than the Latin American crisis criticized by liberals.