一 判例法和法典法之间的比照一向是比较法的老生常谈之一。大陆法系的传统看法不承认判例在普通法国家里那种作为法律渊源所据有的重要地位,而是强调制定法的支配地位。但是,尽管正统的理论坚持把司法判决描述为预先存在的法定前提的逻辑推论,并不是所有的大陆法学者都无视这一事实;任何一部法典都不能真正包罗万象,而法官必定创制法律,即使他们想要把过去立法者的词句适用到没有预见到的或不可 A comparison between case law and code law has always been one of the more commonplace of comparative law. The traditional view of civil law does not recognize the important position of jurisprudence as a source of law in ordinary French countries, but emphasizes the dominance of statutory law. However, notwithstanding the fact that orthodoxy persists in describing the judicial decisions as presupposed legal presuppositions, not all civil law scholars disregard this fact; nor can any codex truly encompass anything, and judges must create laws that even if They want to apply the words of past legislators to what they did not foresee or do