从法律论证以及语言学的角度来看,指导性案例的本质是人类的一种语言交际,是一个动态的话语理解的过程。以第4号、第12号两个故意杀人罪死刑适用指导性案例及最高院对该案例的理解与参照为材料,在对适用死刑的故意杀人罪指导性案例的语篇、论证结构及对量刑情节的语义认知分析的基础上,对该类指导性案例的语用意图进行剖析,并进一步探讨如何实现这类指导性案例的语用意图,也即达到创设一个恰当的死刑适用规准的目的。 From the perspective of legal argumentation and linguistics, the essence of the guiding case is a kind of human language communication, which is a process of dynamic discourse comprehension. Based on the Guiding Cases of Death Penalty of Intentional Homicide, Nos. 4 and 12, and the understanding and reference of the Supreme People’s Court on the case, On the basis of the semantic and cognitive analysis of sentencing circumstances, analyzes the pragmatic intention of such guidance cases and further explores how to achieve the pragmatic intentions of such guidance cases, that is, to create an appropriate applicable standard of death penalty the goal of.