有中学进行辩论赛,题目是“学校考试的利与弊”。辩论,核心是讲道理,是以理服人。故在这个题目上,正方略占便宜。因正方占据了一个“理”:学校、教学、学习,过去、现在、将来,都离不开考试。正方只要始终站稳“理”的立场,胜算极大。反方怎样打这一仗?在没有“理”的根本支撑下,反方只能从“情”的角度寻求突围,并将正方牢牢捆绑在细枝 There are secondary schools debating the topic is “the pros and cons of school examinations.” Debate, the core is reasoning, reason is convincing people. Therefore, in this topic, square slightly less expensive. Due to the square occupy a “rationale ”: schools, teaching, learning, past, present and future, are inseparable from the exam. As long as the square firm “management” position, the odds are great. How can the opposing party fight this battle? Without the fundamental support of “rationale”, the opposing party can only seek a breakthrough from the perspective of “love” and firmly bind the square to the twig