论文部分内容阅读
作为中国最早的共产主义者,李大钊为中国共产主义事业作出了伟大的贡献。同时,由于李大钊所受传统文化的影响,以及当时中国社会现实的制约,在李大钊身上不可避免地呈现出某些过渡的痕迹,存在着若干与他向共产主义者迈进这个主旋律不太和谐的杂音。对于这些不足我们当然要给予实是求是地评析。但是,有少数研究者在评价李大钊时,却把一些不存在的错误加在李大钊身上,这当然是我们所不能接受的。美国学者莫里斯·迈斯纳对于李大钊与中国早期共产主义运动的历史进行了认真的研究.出版了一本《李大钊与中国马克思主义的起源》的专著。作者对李大钊的思想进行了多方位、多层次的细致分析,其中的一些观点对我们研究李大钊思想无疑是很有启发的。但是,书中
As China’s earliest communist, Li Dazhao made great contributions to the cause of communism in China. At the same time, due to the influence of Li Dazhao’s traditional culture and the constraints of the social reality prevailing in China at that time, Li Dazhao inevitably showed some traces of transition and there were some murmurs that were not in harmony with his theme of marching toward the communists . Of course, we must give realistic assessment of these deficiencies. However, when a small number of researchers assessed Li Dazhao, they added some non-existent mistakes to Li Dazhao, which is certainly unacceptable to us. American scholar Maurice Meisner studied earnestly about the history of Li Dazhao and the early communist movement in China, and published a monograph on the origins of Li Dazhao and China’s Marxism. The author conducted a multi-directional and multi-level detailed analysis of Li Dazhao’s thoughts. Some of these opinions are very much inspired by our study of Li Dazhao’s thought. However, the book