去年8月的一天,李某被我饲养的狗咬伤,为治伤,他共花去医药费3000余元。事后,他诉至区法院,要求我赔偿。李某有一名亲戚在区法院工作,我担心区法院会因此而不公正处理,所以没有向法院提供另一邻居王某看到李某挑逗狗的证据。结果一审法院判决我赔偿李某的损失。我不服判决,上诉至中级法院,并提供了证人。结果二审法院改判李某败诉,但是却又判决一、二审的诉讼费和证人出庭作证的费用由我负担。为什么我胜诉了,法院还要判决我承担诉讼费? 你来信中提到的二审胜诉者负担诉讼费和证人出庭作证的费用问题,实际上是一个举证不适时的责任承担问题。我国《民事诉讼法》第64条规定:“当 One day last August, Lee was bitten by my bred dog for his wound healing. He spent a total of more than 3,000 yuan on medical expenses. Later, he sued the district court, asked me to compensation. Lee had a relative working in the district court, I am concerned that the district court will unfairly deal with it, so there is no evidence that the court provided another neighbor, Wang, to see Lee tease the dog. The first instance court ruled that I compensate for Lee’s loss. I disobeyed the verdict, appealed to the mid-level court and provided witness. Results of the second instance court ruling Lee lost, but ruled the first and second instance of the litigation fees and witnesses to testify in court costs borne by me. Why did I win the case, the court also sentenced me to bear the litigation costs? The second instance court heard in your letter litigation fees and costs of witnesses to testify in court, is actually a burden of proof when the burden of responsibility. Article 64 of China’s Civil Procedure Law states: ”When