论文部分内容阅读
20世纪是革命的世纪,也是政党政治的世纪,也就是说革命或者说解放政治总是与政党政治相勾连。但是在20世纪后期,因为“文革”的失败和60年代的终结,出现了否定阶级-政党政治的取向,这种取向以巴丢和鲁索为代表。对此,潘毅从中国革命的历史出发,批判了巴丢与鲁索的政党-形式形而上学,认为他们没有认识到在社会主义建设过程中,群众运动或解放政治的敌人并非纯粹的政党形式,而是资产阶级政党。巴丢和鲁索将资产阶级政党抽象为政党形式本身,从而提出告别政党政治和政党国家的理论。本文旨在分析向社会主义过渡时期先锋党内出现资产阶级政党的政治经济原因,并认为当下更需要党国体制与后政党政治良性互动,从而一方面避免党国体制的彻底官僚化,另一方面造就真正有活力的解放政治。
The twentieth century is the century of revolution and the century of party politics, that is, the revolution or the liberation of politics always involves party politics. However, in the late twentieth century, due to the failure of the “Cultural Revolution” and the end of the 1960s, a denial-party politics emerged. This orientation was represented by Baguio and Russo. In this regard, Pan Yi criticized the political parties, Badu and Russo, from the history of the Chinese revolution and criticized them as formalistic metaphysics. They did not realize that in the course of building socialism, the enemy of the mass movement or liberation of politics was not a purely political party, It is a bourgeois party. Baguio and Rousseau abstracted the bourgeois parties as the political party itself, thus proposing the theory of saying goodbye to party politics and political parties. The purpose of this article is to analyze the political and economic reasons for the appearance of bourgeois parties in the transitional period to socialism and to think that it is more necessary for the present state and post-political parties to interact with each other politically and thus avoid the complete bureaucratization of the Party-state system and, on the other hand, Truly energetic liberating politics.