论文部分内容阅读
致读者 本刊自创刊号就设立了《法规天地》这一栏目,近来,读者认为,这个栏目的名称限制了它的包容力;严肃有余,活泼不足;只知其然,不知其所以然。我们也有同感。经编辑部讨论决定,自本期起栏目更名为《法制天地》。所谓“法制”,其内容当然指与社会保险有关之法令、规章、制度。《法制天地》不仅刊登法令、法规,也刊登规章、制度以及对具体问题的规定。同时增设一个“栏中栏”名为《案例分析》。编写体例为:[案例],说明一个有争议的社会保障问题的提出及争议焦点;[分析],以现行有效政策为依据,对这一问题进行解剖、释疑;[结论],根据现行有效政策,对这一问题提出正确处理办法。最终目的是使读者对这一问题的处理有深层次的了解,不仅能知其然,还要能知其所以然。希望各地有关部门(包括司法机关)按体例编写。不违背全国统一规定的地方实施办法也应视为现行有效政策。我们无力核实,请加盖公章寄来。谢谢。
The reader’s own issue of the magazine has set up a “rule of law” of this section, recently, readers believe that the title of the column limits its inclusiveness; serious, lively enough; only know it, I do not know why. We share the same feeling. The editorial board discussed and decided that since this issue, the column will be renamed “Legal System.” The so-called “legal system,” of course, refers to the contents of the social insurance laws, rules and regulations. The “legal world” not only published laws and regulations, but also published regulations, rules and regulations on specific issues. At the same time create a “column in the column” named “case analysis.” Write the case as follows: [Case], Describe a controversial issue of social security issues and the focus of controversy; [Analysis], based on the current effective policies, to dissect and dispel this issue; [Conclusion] According to the current effective policies , Put forward the correct solution to this issue. The ultimate goal is to enable readers to deal with this issue a deep understanding, not only know it, but also know why. We hope all relevant departments (including the judiciary) to prepare according to the system. Local implementation methods that do not violate the unified national provisions should also be regarded as effective policies in force. We can not verify it, please send it with official seal. Thank you.