论文部分内容阅读
1996年4月11日,许××向黔江县人民法院提起民事诉讼,状告黔江地区交通局侵害其名誉权,诉请人民法院判决被告交通局在原发大范围内以同样方式发文向原告赔礼道歉、恢复名誉并赔偿精神及相关损失3000元。其诉称的主要事实和理由是:交通局1995年3月31日在对其子许谋作出的行政记大过处分文件(黔地交发[1995]字第52号文件)中,指名道姓地捏称“许谋受我局委派到上海购电梯,途经涪陵约其父许××(原文系真实姓名,笔者注)随同外出游玩,回单位后又将其父外出游玩的差旅费2737元发票拿到所辖行业管理企业以其妹的名义报销”。并据此认为交通局歪曲事实,损害退休干部的廉洁形象,低毁了原告的人格尊严,要求交通局依法承担民誉侵权责任。
On April 11, 1996, Xu XX filed a civil lawsuit with Qianjiang County People’s Court, suing Qianjiang Regional Transportation Bureau for infringing upon its reputation, and appealing to the people’s court to order the Defendant Bureau of Communications to issue the same to the plaintiff Apologize, restore reputation and compensate for the spirit and related losses of 3,000 yuan. The main facts and reasons for its claim are as follows: On March 31, 1995, the Bureau of Transportation named in its accountability document (Qian Jiajiao [1995] No. 52 Document) Surnamed pinch said Xu Mou was assigned by my bureau to Shanghai to buy a lift, passing Fuling about his father × × (original text of the real name, the author note) with the travel outside, back to the unit and then go out to travel his father’s travel expenses 2737 yuan Invoice to get under the jurisdiction of industry management companies in the name of their sister reimbursement. " According to this, the Bureau of Transportation distorts the facts, undermines the honest image of retired cadres and ruins the plaintiff’s personal dignity, requiring the Department of Transportation to assume the responsibility of infringement upon reputation in accordance with the law.