论文部分内容阅读
做研究者,还是做“教书匠”?相信不少青年教师都曾考虑过这个问趣——尤其是在今天这样一个推崇科研的时代。现实中一些人选择了前者,于是做课题写论文甚至著书立说,很快脱颖而出;一些人选择了后者,终日埋首于教学事务作业堆课堂,则始终默默无闻。结果便出现了这样的现象:做研究的人对“教书匠”不以为然,认为那是一种落后;“教书匠”们对“研究者”也颇有微词,觉得在现时代做“教书匠”更需要奉献精神。所以,当本刊在今年第三期刊登王俊老师的《做研究者,还是做教书匠?》一文之后,反响几乎持续不断。不少青年教师给编辑打电话、发短信,表示对此有话要说。因此,本刊组织了这样一期讨论。
As a researcher, or as a “bookmaker”? I believe many young teachers have considered this interest - especially in today’s era of respected scientific research. In reality, some people chose the former, so they wrote essays and even wrote books and quickly came to the fore; some chose the latter and buried themselves in the classroom of teaching and learning tasks all the time, they have always been obscure. As a result, the phenomenon appeared that the people who did the research disagreed with the “bookmaker” and considered it a kind of backwardness. “The booksellers also criticized the” researcher, “ ”Bookmakers “ need more dedication. Therefore, when the magazine published the third issue of Wang Jun’s book, ”To be a researcher, or to be a book teacher?", The response was almost continuous. Many young teachers call editors and send text messages, saying there is something to say about this. Therefore, the magazine organized such a discussion.