论文部分内容阅读
在世界各国的刑事证据排除规则之中,德国的证据禁止理论、规则以及司法技术可谓独树一帜。德国证据禁止理论由伯林首倡,经历了一个曲折的发展历程;相应的证据禁止规则虽然只有五十多年的历史,却形成了独具特色的类型和体系;德国联邦宪法法院通过对宪法人权保障条款的解释,构建了一套卓有成效的司法技术。本文通过与美国刑事证据排除规则的比较认为,由于法系传统、诉讼模式上的近似性,我国可以从德国的证据禁止理论及规则获得更多的借鉴。
Among the exclusionary rules of criminal evidence in various countries in the world, German evidence forbids theory, rules and judicial techniques to be unique. The Prohibition of German Evidence Theory was initiated by Berlin and experienced a tortuous course of development. The corresponding evidence forbids the rule to have unique types and systems even though it has only over 50 years of history. The German Federal Constitutional Court passed a review on constitutional human rights Safeguard the interpretation of the terms and establish a set of effective judicial techniques. By comparison with the exclusionary rules of criminal evidence in the United States, this paper argues that due to the similarities and differences between the traditional legal systems and litigation models, our country can learn more from the German theory of prohibition of evidence and rules.