论文部分内容阅读
近年来,司法改革问题越来越多地受到人们的关注。法学界围绕着司法改革所进行的争论与设想不绝于耳,与此同时,司法改革也在司法实务界大张旗鼓地进行着。各地方人民法院、人民检察院作出了各式各样的大胆的创新与尝试。面对这些各自为政式的改革措施,业界评价也是毁誉参半,有人称这些举措是有益的探索,为司法改革探索了道路;也有人对于那些超出法律规定范畴的改革颇有微词。令人眼前一亮的是,2007年国家立法机关、司法部门围绕着司法改革采取了一系列大刀阔斧的举措,不论是出台大量法律、法规,还是收回死刑复核权;不论是统一诉讼收费标准,还是改革审判委员会……细细品来,这些举措无一不指向一个共同的目标:司法改革已经从试验性的零敲碎打走向中央集中部署统一推进。
In recent years, the issue of judicial reform has drawn more and more attention. At the same time, the judicial reform has also been carried out in a big way in the field of judicial practice. Various local people’s courts and people’s procuratorates have made a wide range of bold innovations and attempts. In the face of these fragmented reform measures, the industry’s assessment is also mixed. Some have called these measures a useful exploration and exploration of the path for judicial reform. Others have criticized those reforms that are beyond the scope of the law. What is impressive is that in 2007, the national legislature and the judiciary took a series of drastic measures around the judicial reform, whether it is issuing a large number of laws and regulations or reinstating the right to review the death penalty; whether it is a unified lawsuit charging standard or not Reform judiciary committees ... all sorts of things. All these measures all point to a common goal: the judicial reform has moved from a trial-and-error piecemeal to centralized deployment by the Central Government.