论文部分内容阅读
竞争法的宗旨是鼓励竞争,对可能限制竞争甚至造成垄断的行为加以禁止。知识产权法的宗旨则是鼓励创造,通过法律手段人为地赋予知识产权人对其智力成果的垄断。近年来,大多数学者从理论层面探讨对知识产权这种人造的非自然的垄断是否会破坏竞争法所致力于维护的自由竞争环境。本文中,笔者另辟蹊径,从腾讯手游市场繁荣背后的原因出发,探讨反垄断法对于创意的保护,来证明反垄断法的宗旨与知识产权宗旨其实是不谋而合的。
The purpose of competition law is to encourage competition and prohibit acts that may limit competition or even create a monopoly. The purpose of intellectual property law is to encourage creation by artificially giving intellectual property rights to monopoly their intellectual achievements. In recent years, most scholars have discussed theoretically whether man-made, unnatural monopolies such as intellectual property rights will undermine the free competitive environment in which competition laws are committed. In this article, I find another way, starting from the reasons behind the prosperity of the mobile games market in Tencent, to explore the protection of the anti-monopoly law on creativity to prove that the purpose of the anti-monopoly law and intellectual property purpose is actually coincide.