论文部分内容阅读
十六大将马克思主义理论创新提到了十分重要的地位。怎样积极地有效地开展马克思主义理论创新,是一个早已存在而又崭新的命题,是一个涉及面广泛而又很复杂的课题。我只就其中某些方面作零星的思考。我很同意程恩富关于区分官方马克思主义者和学界马克思主义者的见解。这并不意味着马克思主义有“官方”和“学界”两种不同的性质,而是说马克思主义理论的创新者所担任的社会角色有“官方”和“学界”的区别。党大力倡导马克思主义理论创新所指向的对象,显然不仅仅是党的领袖(对于他们无须大力倡导),而是广大的理论工作者和有理论兴趣的实际工作者。只有把后者的创新积极
The 16th CPC National Congress referred to the very important position of Marxist theoretical innovation. How to carry out Marxist theoretical innovation actively and effectively is an already existing and brand-new proposition, which is a topic that involves a wide range of issues and is complicated. I will only sporadically think about some of these aspects. I very much agree with Cheng Enfu’s opinion on the distinction between official Marxists and academic Marxists. This does not mean that Marxism has two different qualities: “official” and “academic”, but rather that the social roles assumed by the innovators of Marxist theory include “official” and “academic” "The difference. The party vigorously advocates the object pointed out by Marxist theoretical innovation. It is clear that it is not just the party leaders (for whom they do not have to vigorously advocate), but the broad theoretical workers and practical workers with theoretical interests. Only the latter’s innovation is positive