论文部分内容阅读
本业’、`末业’的划分及`重本抑末’思想,并不产生于商周春秋时期,也不起源于儒家,而是在战国时期,为适应各诸侯国富国强兵的愿望,由法家首先提出来的.盐铁会议上,大夫、御史以法家的`民强国弱’、`利出一孔’作为理论根据,打出`本末并利’的旗号,实际上是主张通过官府直接参与经济活动来打击民间商贾;贤良、文学则继承了早期儒家的义利观和`藏富于民’的思想,借用`重本抑末’的口号,反对官府`与民争利’.他们所争论的焦点,并不是要不要`末业’的存在,而是由谁来经营`末业’&&前者力主官营的合理性,后者则指出官营的种种弊端.
The division of the ’industry’ and ’the end of the industry’ and the thought of ’repressing the capital over the capital’ did not arise from the Spring and Autumn Period of the Shang and Zhou Dynasties nor did they originate from the Confucianists. However, during the Warring States period, in order to meet the wishes of the rich and poor nations , First proposed by the legalists.At salt iron conference, the doctor and the censor hit the banner of “end of line and benefit” based on the fact that the law and order of ’ Advocating the direct participation of the government through economic activities to fight against non-governmental merchants; virtuous, literary inheritance of the early Confucianism and the concept of “enriching the people in possession of the people”, borrowing the “capital out of breath” slogan against the government ’ The point they are debating is not whether they want to end their business or not, but who is going to run the business of the ’end-of-ku’ business, and the latter points out the disadvantages of the government-run business.