论文部分内容阅读
目的:调查新兵群体心理健康状况,为提高兵员质量提供参考。方法:采用SCL-90量表测评,研究新兵群体的心理健康状况。结果:主动组在总分及各因子分上显著低于被动组,差异非常显著(P<0.01);党团员组在总分及各因子分上显著低于青年组,差异非常显著(P<0.01);城镇组在强迫症状、人际关系敏感和恐怖因子分上低于农村组,差异显著(P<0.05);大专及以上组在强迫症状因子分上低于高中及以下组,差异显著(P<0.05),在总分、躯体化、人际关系敏感、抑郁、恐怖、偏执、敌对和附加项因子分上显著低于高中及以下组,差异非常显著(P<0.01);独生子女组在焦虑因子分上高于非独生子女组,差异显著(P<0.05),在躯体化因子分上显著高于非独生子女组,差异非常显著(P<0.01)。与既往研究有差异,既往研究表明两组间各因子上差异不显著;无不良嗜好组在总分及所有因子分上显著低于有不良嗜好组,差异非常显著(P<0.01);社交复杂组在人际关系敏感因子分上高于社交简单组,差异显著(P<0.05),在总分及其他各项因子分上显著高于社交简单组,差异非常显著(P<0.01);家庭关系和谐组在焦虑因子分上低于不和谐组,差异显著(P<0.05),在总分、强迫症状、人际关系敏感、抑郁、敌对、恐怖、偏执和附加项因子分上显著低于不和谐组,差异非常显著(P<0.01);民主组在总分及各因子分上显著低于非民主组,差异非常显著(P<0.01);应届组在焦虑、恐怖和附加项因子分上低于往届组,差异显著(P<0.05),在总分和其他各因子上显著低于往届组,差异非常显著(P<0.01);有特长组在总分及所有因子分上显著低于无特长组,均差异非常显著(P<0.01)。结论:影响新兵心理健康状况因素有入伍意愿、政治面貌、成长环境、独生子女与否、有无不良嗜好、社会交往情况、家庭关系和谐程度、家庭抚养方式、文化程度、毕业年限及有无特长等。
Objective: To investigate the mental health of recruits and to provide reference for improving the quality of soldiers. Methods: Using SCL-90 scale assessment, to study the mental health of recruits groups. Results: The active group was significantly lower than the passive group in the total score and each factor score (P <0.01), and the score of the active members was significantly lower than that of the youth group in the total score and each factor (P < 0.01). The scores of compulsion symptoms, interpersonal sensitivity and terror factor in urban group were significantly lower than those in rural group (P <0.05). The scores of compulsory symptom scores in junior college and above were significantly lower than those in high school and below (P <0.05). The scores of total score, somatization, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, terror, paranoid, hostility and additional items were significantly lower than those in high school and below (P <0.01) The anxiety factor score was higher than that of the non-only-child group (P <0.05), and was significantly higher in the somatization factor score than that of the non-only-child group (P <0.01). Previous studies showed that the difference between the two groups was insignificant. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the total score and all factors (P <0.01). The social complex (P <0.05). The score was significantly higher in the total scores and other factors than in the social simple group (P <0.01). The family relationship The harmony group was lower than the disharmony group in the anxiety factor scores (P <0.05), and was significantly lower than the total score, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, hostility, terror, paranoid and additional factors (P <0.01). Demographic group was significantly lower than the non-demographic group in total score and each factor (P <0.01), and the scores of anxiety, terror and additional factors Compared with the previous group, the difference was significant (P <0.01), and there was significant difference between the total score and all factors in the total score and other factors Specialty group, the differences were significant (P <0.01). Conclusion: The factors influencing the mental health status of recruits include the willingness to enter the army, the political environment, the growth environment, the only child or not, the bad habits, the social interaction, the degree of family harmony, the way of family support, education level, graduation age, Wait.