论文部分内容阅读
四川省潼南县人民法院坚持实事求是,调查研究,弄清问题症结,有针对性地向当事人宣传政策法律,使一件闹了十七年的房产纠纷在三天内圆满解决。 纠纷由来 一九六四年冬天,潼南县玉溪公社五大队二生产队社员潘克辉、吉迅与生产队为一间44.4平方米的中堂屋产权发生了纠纷。潘、吉两原告声称:“现因人多房少,要求生产队将占用我们的中堂屋退还自用”。他们边说边拿出了管业证,并说有土改分配小组成员蒋云光等三人作证;一九六二年纠正“一平二调”时,
The People’s Court of Tongnan County, Sichuan Province, persisted in seeking truth from facts, conducted investigations and studies, clarified the crux of the problem and publicized policies and laws in a targeted manner so that a real estate dispute that lasted for 17 years was satisfactorily solved within three days. The Origin of the Dispute In the winter of 1964, Pan Kehui, Jixun, members of the second production team of the Fifth Brigade of Yuxi Commune in Tongnan County, Jisun and the production team made a dispute over the property right of a 44.4 square meter Zhongtang House. The plaintiffs Pan and Kyrgyzstan claimed: “Due to the fact that more people and fewer houses are required, the production team will be required to take up our self-help home in Zhonglang House.” They said they took out the permit and said that there were testimony given by Jiang Yun-kuang, a member of the land reform and reorganization team. In 1962, when correcting “one peace and two revisions”