论文部分内容阅读
在我国刑事诉讼中,二审法院以事实不清或者证据不足而裁定发回原审法院重新审判的案件,是否可以退回检察机关补充侦查,法律没有明确的规定,法学理论界对此意见不一,司法实践中作法也各不相同。有些同志认为,重审案件不能再退回检察机关补充侦查,而应由原审法院负责处理,否则就是违反刑诉法的规定,如果原审法院在审理中认为需要补充事实与证据的,可以根据《刑事诉讼法》第109条的规定自行调查。笔者认为,对重审案件的处理不能作一刀切,对于通过自行调查可以弄清事实、获取补充证据的案件,人民法院应当自行负责调查、审理,不能再退回检察机关;对于一些确有退
In our country’s criminal proceedings, the court of second instance, with unclear facts or evidence, ruled that the case sent back to the court of first instance for retrial should be returned to the prosecutorial office for additional investigation. There is no clear law in the law. Practices also vary. Some comrades consider that retrial cases can no longer be returned to the prosecution for supplementary investigation but should be handled by the trial court or otherwise violated the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law. If the trial court considers it necessary to supplement the facts and evidence, Act "Article 109 of the provisions of its own investigation. The author believes that the handling of retrial cases can not be applied across the board. For those cases that can make clear their own facts and obtain additional evidence through their own investigations, the people’s court should be responsible for investigating and handling cases and should not be returned to the procuratorial organs.