我在结合众多的史实之后,觉得《鸿门宴》一文有悖真实。此文中,把刘邦刻画得知人善用,能言善辩,机诈权变。然而却把项羽贬述成一个沽名钓誉、轻狂残暴、寡谋寡断之人。但根据历史可以见证,项羽是一个百年难得的人才。年少时,便志存高远,自认可以取代始皇;破釜沉舟,巨鹿一役,便 After combining many historical facts, I felt that the article in “The Banquet” was flawless. In this article, Liu Bang is portrayed as a good use of people, capable of arguing and arbitrage, and changing the power of fraud. However, Xiang Yu was devalued as a person who was known for his reputation, arrogant cruelty, and recklessness. However, according to history, it can be seen that Xiang Yu is a century-long rare talent. When he was young, he was very ambitious and he believed that he could replace Shi Huang;