论文部分内容阅读
任何案件中都有可能发生争议事实没有足够证据辅助的情况,而在现代法治中,这并不能成为法官拒绝裁判的理由,证明责任正是在这个意义上显示出其重要性。环境侵权诉讼因其参与双方的地位特殊性,证明责任的分配有着自身的特点。在对证明责任的性质进行理论分析的基础上,对我国环境侵权诉讼中证明责任分配原则进行制定法层面的解读并进行比较清晰的定位,进而为其改进的提供理论上的支撑。
In any case, there is a possibility that the facts of the dispute do not have enough evidence to assist. In modern law and order, this can not justify the judge’s refusal to show that the responsibility shows its importance in this sense. Due to the special status of environmental rights infringement involved parties, the distribution of burden of proof has its own characteristics. On the basis of the theoretical analysis of the nature of the burden of proof, this paper interprets the principle of the distribution of burden of proof in the litigation of environmental infringement in our country and makes a clear definition of it, and then provides theoretical support for its improvement.