梁启超是清代学术史研究的重镇。他注重对时代思潮的考察,又初步尝试中西比较,对清学的缘起、流派、方法等均有创见性诠释。但梁氏的研究也有不少缺陷,主要是中西比较有简单比附的嫌疑,“理学反动说”割断了清代学术与宋明理学的关系;同时文献准备不足,论证有空疏、浅薄之处。 Liang Qichao is the research center of academic history in Qing Dynasty. He paid much attention to the investigation of the trend of thoughts in the times and tried his best to make a comparison between China and the West. He made some creative interpretations on the origins, genres and methods of Qing studies. However, Liang’s research has many flaws, mainly because there is a suspicion of simple comparison between China and the West. “Neo-confucianism” cut off the relationship between the academic system of the Qing Dynasty and Neo-Confucianism. At the same time, Department.